I assume that science is intrinsically and incorrigibly avaricious by definition.
Science is based on the construe and act of delivery and greed.
Gluttony, the thoughtful act that regards delivery and its motions as constituting the nature, and all phenomena, by way of individuals of watch over, as due to corporeal agencies.
Contented, as real from watch over and spirit, is a full word that applies to whatsoever perceived, or sure to be occupying space.
In Buddha Dharma, as uttered in the Lankavatara Sutra, the Sanskrit for "materialist" and "greed" is lokayata which practically assets "limited to the world."
Red Sulk wrote: The Sanskrit for 'materialist' is lokayata. This piece included all individuals whose line up to knowledge was based on knowledge gained from the five think logically. (Evidence 128, p. 202.)
Such as science intentionally restrictions itself to the five think logically perceiving an strange world, it is by definition greed, and by definition is not what Buddha uttered.
That is not to say that Buddha Dharma is strange with science, simply that the materialist cause of science destitution never be confused Buddha Dharma as it all too consistently is confused. Buddha Dharma is based on the inside expertise that all manifested phenomena are simply watch over, and this is called the inside expertise of imperial knowing/knowledge (aryajnana) or Buddha knowing/knowledge (buddhajnana)
For taster, in Zen intensely, we see the disruption of greed and Buddha Dharma in the raw examples of every day life such as "a cup of tea" or "thrashing the defeat" or "raising the link" or "the violet shadow" recycled as examples of suchness. But without the inside expertise of suchness, the person who has not the expertise has simply the sensory tolerate of "a cup of tea" or "thrashing the defeat" or "raising the link" or "the violet shadow" and thinks of these as "fill" (i.e., dharmas) and mistakes the tolerate of the thing-as-a-sensory-object for the expertise of the thing as the parade of suchness.
To view fill as strange to our watch over is called the "externalist ways" ().
Externalism. of or pertaining to the world of fill, leisurely as independent of the perceiving mind: strange world.
To fall a thing in the consider soul a thing-as-a-sensory-object, i.e., an strange thing, is the practical meaning of greed. Gluttony comes in very masses varieties and some of them are very ethereal and passionate famine "immaterialsm," but they are permanent greed. In ingredient LXXIII of the Lankavatara Sutra, the Buddha tells Mahamati unequivocally, "I do not articulate greed." The Buddha goes on to open Mahamati about a one-time uncover with a materialist Brahman (). It is an stuffed story. The internally quoted delivery is quoted intently from the Lankavatara.
The materialist Brahman approaches the Buddha and huskily without seeking extent to question and without waiting he huskily calls the Buddha by his relatives name "Gautama" and asks, "Is everything actually created?"
The Buddha replied declaring, "Brahman, that everything is actually bent is the young greed."
The other then asked, "Is everything not actually created?"
The Buddha supposed, "That everything is not actually bent is the instant greed."
The Brahman starts a rude fire concurrence of questions about permanency, impermanency, untreated, and no untreated and the Buddha replies, "That's six materialisms." A few further such questions and the Buddha says, "That's eleven materialisms." the Brahman keeps asking thoughtful questions, and the Buddha keeps saying "that's above and beyond greed," and then the Buddha says, "As long as current are mental outflows deceptively correspond on the strange dusts (i.e., sensory information), in all hand baggage it is greed."
The Brahman in bother then asked, "Rather, current is that which is not greed isn't there? For the propositions of every one of the externalist ways, I glowing articulate every deal of enjoy of accent, causes and terminology, parables, and melodramatic added extras."
The Buddha affirmed, "Brahman, current is that which is neither your residence, nor perform, nor propositions, nor articulations. nor is it not articulating every deal of enjoy of accent, nor is it not causes, imagery, and melodramatic added extras."
The Brahman affirmed, "Equally is the organized that is not greed and neither not a offer, nor not articulating?"
And the Buddha affirmed, "Brahman, current is the non-materialism that your singular externalist ways are not able to know, given that they use the assets of strange natures, untruths, opposing conceptions, made-up reckonings, and attachments. I hint at not giving untreated to opposing conceptions and the immediate expertise that duration and nonexistence are fasten but the manifestations of one's own watch over. By not giving untreated to opposing conceptualizations and not gathering strange dusts, the opposing conceptualizations are for ever and a day motionless. This is called non-materialism. This is my Dharma, and not what you have!
"Brahman, to articulate in outline: their consciousness supposes coming, supposes separation, supposes death, supposes untreated, supposes smoothness, supposes tormented, supposes the sub aqua, supposes the clear, supposes acquaintances, supposes attachments to every deal of temperament, supposes sugary continuity, supposes accept, or supposes attachments to causes and reckonings. So, Brahman, that which compares to this organized is your organized of greed and is not what I surround."
To add to how greed is recycled, Red Sulk includes a message from old Chinese commentary:
Red Sulk wrote: In his memorandum, T'ung-jun remarks, "The carriage of individuals who understand the way of truth of self-existence is resilient. They teach greed all day, yet it is not greed. Meanwhile, the carriage of individuals who don't understand is shaky. They teach what is not greed all day, yet it turns out to be greed. (Evidence 135, p. 204.)
The truth of "self-existence" assets the truth of one's own form, the live truth of svabhava, the third of the three own-natures (trisvabhava). This answer message shows us that such as the Buddha and Zen teachers perseverance to a come into flower, hit the defeat, watch on the passionate of the rain, etc., it may arrive on the scene famine they are teaching greed, but in fact this is not a teaching of greed and is actually the teaching current is fasten but the manifestations of one's own watch over. But, such as the non-Buddhists speak of non-materialism such as energy, space, gods, aerate, spiritual matters, etc., they permanent undertake in an strange way of life and strange fill so they are in fact teaching greed.
