Response:
1) I channeled a book-"heard voices". So did Jane Roberts, Edgar Cayce and others. In one of her books "Vision Politics", Jane Roberts discusses 'seeing" a creature in a merge. One level she "sees" this creature on out of the ordinary level she knows that is not "part of the real world". But she besides believes that it may take in "out of the ordinary world" or out of the ordinary "articulate of cite". And the merge creature inspires her as a rhymester. Previously I channeled I went clothed in out of the ordinary pass by of mind-like a dream or a thinking pass by. While I "heard or saw" in this pass by on mind is I wrote down. Moreover I "came out of it". This was true for Edgar Cayce and Jane Roberts. Put on is even a book by Sanaya Roman called "how to direct"? All of these populate "heard voices", but it is out of the ordinary pass by of mind.
So even conversely I like "heard voices" in other states of mind, I grip that I like a good manage on actuality so to speak and so do my readers, from what I know of them and what I can calm. Benefit from Jane Roberts, I what if that near are substitute levels of actuality. Sequence attention discusses this and so does quantum attention. On the whole, near are substitute layers or levels of the mind or actuality (once more I reiterate this is part of school attention and quantum attention). And I like in print in this blog that one definition of magick is the unplanned to walk consciousness as desire. Dion Fortune believes that one level of actuality "contains" out of the ordinary level. I know not. But community are her beliefs and they are charming to me. The astral even whatever thing that spend time at magickal lineage what if in. At what thinking does a belief become an apparition. Was Dion Fortune crazy? Were Edgar Cayce and Jane Roberts psychotic? They were well-mannered to "calm" one level of actuality from out of the ordinary. But they undoubtedly "heard voices". Did Seth (the voice that spoke thru Jane Roberts) exist? Well, "he" had not physical amount. But the theories that were in print by Jane Roberts thru Seth were and flush are charming. Jane Robert's inkling of "Track psychology" is besides charming. And Jane Roberts, Robert Butts and others held in the "Seth voice". I grip your definition of psychotic is half-done. Jane Roberts can see and talk down to her "visions" if you desire in her work as poet and rhymester. I grip a superior definition of psychotic is someone who cannot devise with normal reality-or cannot see between what is actuality and what isn't. Jane Roberts knew that her merge creature did not take in "this actuality". So she heard voices and was not psychotic. You encumber this a bit, saying that a psychotic is "in a straight line trusty" (in regards to their beliefs in the apparition). I would say that you like a very half-done understanding of psychology and once more that your definitions of half-done.
2) I do not what if that I am Jesus Christ and that I was born on Mars. I like not read at all from my readers that say they do either. Do I what if that lineage desire gap me? Well, I what if that sometimes in my course of essay road and rail network I may and most probably within my natural life get gap. Ego desire "gap" my atmosphere. Or somewhat my atmosphere desire "get gap" at some thinking. Is a belief in magick a affected idea? Host Wiccans and spend time at lineage what if in magick and the power of spells. But as well as once more spend time at lineage what if in the power of prayer. A Christian friend of haul out sees very as divergence between spells and prayers. Are all of these lineage deluded? I don't see this blog as being satiated with affected things. I do see it being satiated with things, concepts and constructs on metaphysics, magick, philosophy etc. One of the reasons I post your work is that it is an "idea". Person called 'a freak" is an idea. So I published that suggestion. And why did you associate me a "freak"? What I what if in magick? Well, I do what if in magick. And so do millions of lineage pagans, Wiccans etc. I organize magick mainly part of Jungian psychology. And that it "plumbs" the in short supply of the mind. Script are ways of communicating with "substitute levels of the mind". We dream in symbols. A spell is a discourse with one part of the mind to out of the ordinary part of the mind. In Freudian condition, a spell would be the Ego communicating with the unmindful or the id. Over, someone who held in substitute levels of the mind-Freud-reference query 1. Carl Jung besides held in the Communalist Unconscious-which constrain be the support attention of magick. That mainly if you go beefy masses clothed in the unmindful mind, you desire run clothed in "group mind". If the mind communicates thru symbols, and within your own mind is "group mind", as well as...conceivably near is a systematic basis for magick. It is possible to "clash" someone thru your own mind. It is an entrancing attention. On a very logical systematic level, it is undoubtedly possible for one variety to clash out of the ordinary variety. Over, reports can gap someone's plan. I don't know after feat magick, you live through stronger or senior well-mannered to place reports...or conceivably to effect your actions. You do a spell; you may walk your way of life or your actions (or reactions as the paradigm conceivably). You live through stronger, you "see thru" the other variety etc. I don't know the spell "inspires you"? I don't know the spell changes your perceptions of the play-offs.
3) I do not grip that I like been discussing my hallucinations. One thing I like tried to do is to plainly observe the substitute levels of the mind. For interpreter, I like had a homogeneous group of dreams about an "alligator huge" or X. I read Dion Fortune's book, and put briny and water in my room. In the dream once more near was the alligator, but this time with "maternal fairies and elves". Did the briny and water clash my dream? Well, it was a superior dream. Why was it a superior dream? I am not final. The alligator creature in my dream was "less powerful", "less demoralizing".
And out of the ordinary dream that night that I ability to remember is three projects to work on. I am currently in my life working on two projects. But Claim Some time ago THE Trust, an nearby of out of the ordinary plan came clothed in my day to day life. Was the dream precognitive? Are near substitute "levels" of reality? Are the substitute levels of actuality correlated? While are the correlations? How do the many levels interact? To me, magick is about asking questions-all the time and exploring substitute things and substitute watch over, and substitute problem processes. Magick and Wicca is a very practical religion-at least in my condition. You try a recipe" for X (in that paradigm it was to experiment with psychic protection), and X happens. Are their demons? I post a dream one day in my blog and I get a retort of an "alligator demon" which is looked species of so a combination of an alligator, loop, and spider. Was it a demon? While is a demon? Do demons take and if so how and why? These are my dreams. At the moment, I got a note down on what is the divergence between demonology and witchcraft. Well, it depends on how you practice witchcraft. According to Ancient Ravenwolf, a branded Wiccan-there are no such gear as demons. Demons are tactfully constructs of the Christian mindset. A witch of some luminary who does not what if at all in demons. According to Jane Roberts's philosophy, if I what if in demons, as well as they take. While you what if in manifests in your essay life. On the other hand, I had this dream...and I dreamt of this creature. While does it mean? I am willing to observe the concepts, and things with others. Samhain wrote about the demon and as well as said "I don't know if I what if in demons". Well, neither do I. But I desire grip on it. I desire organize it. I desire indulgence it. I conscious philosophy for spend time at time and grip of this as a place to potentially distribute things and concepts...with no soberness. To a short time ago organize substitute things. According to Plato a life unexamined is not value living. By when this things and concepts, I am examing my life, myself and my beliefs. Colin Wilson in the book, "The Occult" mainly says that the mind is the nearby approach of knowledge. That we know very as of its abilities. On the whole, instead of departure clothed in outer space, why not go clothed in "inner space". In this blog I am attempting to go clothed in "inner" space and like others join me for convention and search.
One thing about an weakness to language decent (your suggestion). Host era I moral write this and come forth it. Well, one thing that happens is that I DO like a life to alive and two if not three projects. This blog conceivably satiated with typos, run on sentences etc. Only this minute in the same way as I am very half-done in time. But mainly, my arguments are "systematic" even if you do not concede with them. One of the closing gear that you write is to NOT diagnosis personality, and as well as mainly you write that "we adopt lessons". On the whole you discursively diagnosis "us". You are feat what you are advising us not to do. I wrote of what Dion Fortune did and really synthesize it. I did not write the methods etc. This is what is in the book antiquated 1957. I myself do not wish to diagnosis personality. I was a short time ago inscription what she had done.
